30 Seconds To Mars: Animal Liberation Front - 30 Seconds To Mars

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Animal Liberation Front Thoughts on it

#1 User is offline   forever_you 

  • Imperial Stormtrooper
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,375
  • Joined: 20-April 07

Posted 16 January 2009 - 02:44 PM

The ALF is a militant group dedicated to freeing animals from labs, destroying labs that do conduct research on animals, and harassing the Scientists but rarely harm them

Your thoughts on the group, and I do support, for animal liberation

#2 User is offline   Jenni6277 

  • Love is a force of nature
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,800
  • Joined: 19-April 08

Posted 16 January 2009 - 03:50 PM

Where the animals go when they are free?

#3 User is offline   forever_you 

  • Imperial Stormtrooper
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,375
  • Joined: 20-April 07

Posted 16 January 2009 - 03:54 PM

They take care of them

#4 User is offline   Sanna/Swe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,716
  • Joined: 05-November 08

Posted 16 January 2009 - 04:05 PM

QUOTE (forever_you @ Jan 16 2009, 11:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
They take care of them


Sure unsure.gif
I mean are you sure?

Some just save them and think they will survive in their new naturial freedom, but there is rarly someone who does.... mellow.gif
But if they take care of them...well thats good! laugh.gif

#5 User is offline   forever_you 

  • Imperial Stormtrooper
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,375
  • Joined: 20-April 07

Posted 16 January 2009 - 04:08 PM

Or a free roaming farm so to speak

#6 User is offline   Jenni6277 

  • Love is a force of nature
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,800
  • Joined: 19-April 08

Posted 16 January 2009 - 04:13 PM

There are lots of fur farmers where I come from and many different "animal free groups" and what I read from ALF's site some groups act in their name. But usually the "liberators" don't take care of the animals afterwards. They leave the minks/foxes in the wild where they die because they have lived their whole life in captivity and can't hunt. And usually the animals are so damaged mentally and physically that they have to be put down. I don't know what methods the "liberators" use but I don't believe that it is done by a vet.

So, I am against these kinds of actions. There are more effective and legal ways too.

#7 User is offline   forever_you 

  • Imperial Stormtrooper
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,375
  • Joined: 20-April 07

Posted 16 January 2009 - 04:20 PM

I would take care of them

#8 Guest_Not Jer_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 16 January 2009 - 04:37 PM

The ALF has no clue what it is doing half the time and most of the members are terribly misguided and ill informed. Like PETA.

#9 User is offline   forever_you 

  • Imperial Stormtrooper
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,375
  • Joined: 20-April 07

Posted 16 January 2009 - 04:49 PM

They are also labeled as a terrorist organization by the US govt. but nowadays even the US govt. would label Washington or the American Militia as a terrorist group

#10 User is offline   grrli 

  • Earth global resident, Mars transient
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,544
  • Joined: 17-September 08

Posted 16 January 2009 - 10:15 PM

QUOTE (forever_you @ Jan 16 2009, 06:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I would take care of them

So you know how to properly care for a group of rats injected with formula XYZ?

Or are capable of caring for a creature that has survived vivisection?

And imagine that the creatures you freed, the formula being tested or disease being studies could cause health problems i YOU once you have them?

Or that in freeing/stealing them, you just condemn your friend's aunt to death because the study wasn't completed in time and she gets a disease they were testing treatments for.


It's never black and white. It's ugly shades of gray and NOT to be meddled with lightly or with the Idealist's rose colored glasses stuck in place.

#11 User is offline   forever_you 

  • Imperial Stormtrooper
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,375
  • Joined: 20-April 07

Posted 16 January 2009 - 10:18 PM

haha no, thats where you come in, and others

#12 User is offline   grrli 

  • Earth global resident, Mars transient
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,544
  • Joined: 17-September 08

Posted 16 January 2009 - 11:08 PM

QUOTE (forever_you @ Jan 17 2009, 12:18 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
haha no, thats where you come in, and others

Ha ha, no. I have my own animals with issues. I can barely deal with the personal distress that gives me without handling the decisions of others made whimsically as well.

Regardless, it is up to ANYONE who takes up a banner to research not only the goals of their particular banner, but the 'enemy' as well. Put aside your prejudice and hatred in the scrutiny of your enemy, and you'll find that you'll loose a lot of enemies.
But possibly get really depressed. Black and whites are so much easier to deal with.

You stand with them if you want, but know, learn, understand from as many sources as possible (not just ALF friendly ones) what you're aligning yourself with or you will recognize your massive failure to educate yourself later on.

#13 User is offline   forever_you 

  • Imperial Stormtrooper
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,375
  • Joined: 20-April 07

Posted 16 January 2009 - 11:24 PM

Rather read something like their Manifesto, like the IRA Handbook

#14 User is offline   Iota Carinae 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 125
  • Joined: 16-March 08

  Posted 16 January 2009 - 11:40 PM

QUOTE (forever_you @ Jan 16 2009, 01:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The ALF is a militant group dedicated to freeing animals from labs, destroying labs that do conduct research on animals, and harassing the Scientists but rarely harm them

Your thoughts on the group, and I do support, for animal liberation


Violence NEVER solves violence, even if said violence is done in the name of "liberation." The solution to the issue of animal exploitation is to raise our collective consciousness to include this new "other." To achieve this goal, compassion is our only tool. Harassment and property damage create alienation and fear - it will not change most people's outlooks.

For an very well written discourse on the terror tactics used by some animal rights groups, I suggest reading Capers In The Churchyard: Animal Rights Advocacy in the Age of Terror by Lee Hall.

For anyone who truly cares about the plight of our nonhuman family, one positive direct action that anyone can take it to look at their own life in order to make changes to reduce the amount of suffering we are personally contributing to this planet. Change yourself, and you change the world.

Make peace with yourself, and the world will find peace. So simple, yet so hard. Enjoy wink.gif

Shannon

#15 User is offline   forever_you 

  • Imperial Stormtrooper
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,375
  • Joined: 20-April 07

Posted 16 January 2009 - 11:52 PM

I understand, but violence and direct action always has its purpose especially when it is just

#16 User is offline   swedish/match 

  • Life is a perpetual drunkenness
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,900
  • Joined: 09-December 04

Posted 17 January 2009 - 02:06 AM

If they expect "rescued" animals from labs and fur farms to readapt to the forest they are obviously poorly educated or otherwise uniformed. What one could argue is whether it is preferable to die of starvation/the cold/predators or to get your skin ripped off your body, alternatively to be subjected to tests too brutal (and/or unjustified) to perform on humans until you drop dead or are disposed of. Really?

There are other ways to experiment not involving animals and if animal testing was prohibited today, I'm sure these would be more or less perfected within a few years. I'm weary of the 'dying relative argument', as if that puts an end to all discussion. I refuse to believe there could be no other way, if there was a will to make these changes and the funds to back it up.

No, I don't think smashing labs is particularly productive or effective, my guess is this is desperate people wanting to make their message heard. It's headlines. The fact that people react more to the activist's nuttiness than their cause is unfortunate. Remember how people looked upon "tree-huggers" just a few years ago?

#17 User is offline   forever_you 

  • Imperial Stormtrooper
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,375
  • Joined: 20-April 07

Posted 17 January 2009 - 02:17 AM

You just cant make a once non-enemy to your cause a enemy to your cause, so you gotta make sure your actions do not affect the your non-enemies

#18 User is offline   grrli 

  • Earth global resident, Mars transient
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,544
  • Joined: 17-September 08

Posted 17 January 2009 - 08:57 AM

QUOTE (forever_you @ Jan 17 2009, 01:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Rather read something like their Manifesto, like the IRA Handbook


Good reading... but it's only a start. Only, barely, just a start.

QUOTE (forever_you @ Jan 17 2009, 01:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I understand, but violence and direct action always has its purpose especially when it is just


Please give examples, or I just can not believe your claim. SO NOT convinced by one small statement that has a lot of words with too many connotations.

QUOTE (forever_you @ Jan 17 2009, 04:17 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You just cant make a once non-enemy to your cause a enemy to your cause, so you gotta make sure your actions do not affect the your non-enemies


Clarify, please?
Is English your primary language, or is it a secondary?

#19 User is offline   forever_you 

  • Imperial Stormtrooper
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,375
  • Joined: 20-April 07

Posted 17 January 2009 - 12:39 PM

Afraid of Homeland Security laugh.gif

#20 Guest_Not Jer_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 17 January 2009 - 01:35 PM

QUOTE (Iota Carinae @ Jan 17 2009, 01:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
For anyone who truly cares about the plight of our nonhuman family, one positive direct action that anyone can take it to look at their own life in order to make changes to reduce the amount of suffering we are personally contributing to this planet. Change yourself, and you change the world.

Except that deciding you don't want to eat turkey and shrimp anymore doesn't actually do shit to change the outside world. Don't confuse symbolic action for direct action, it is little more than talk. You don't have to change yourself or eating habits in order to get laws passed that prevent animals from being mistreated in testing labs or abattoirs, all you have to do is get those ideas out there and convince people they are good ideas. Too many people rely on ultra-introspection because they seem more concerned with attaining the moral high ground and it doesn't do a bit of good towards any cause.

QUOTE (grrli @ Jan 17 2009, 10:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Please give examples, or I just can not believe your claim. SO NOT convinced by one small statement that has a lot of words with too many connotations.

Cuban Revolution.

QUOTE (forever_you @ Jan 17 2009, 02:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
-From the IRA Green Book

It would probably be a good idea not to post anything from that, even if you are a CIRA supporter. PIRA has abandoned armed struggle and the future of Ireland belongs to Sinn Fein using the diplomatic process. The vision of the future for Ireland no longer lies with the Army Council, and Gerry Adams knows what he is doing, irrespective of my thoughts on returning to violence. Regardless, that passage only states something that is the opposite of every ALF action. All it says is if a Volunteer accidentally or otherwise damages someone's property in the course of service, that person should be given restitution by supporters of the movement in order to build community. All the ALF does is burn down labs, set animals free, and then jack themselves off like "JOB WELL DONE LADS!" Meanwhile, people are still dying of diseases that those animals were being tested to cure because the animals were more than likely found with the same disease, what a concept. Either that or they were injected with antibodies or some shit, but usually in those cases they were bred in those labs, not the taken from the wild, for that very reason. There was a case back when I was in high school too, of the ALF attacking some testing facility with monkeys and one of the ALF members wound up in the hospital a couple of days later because one of the monkeys had a contagious illness, and oops, he must have gotten to close to it.

The AFL doesn't do more harm than good, they only do harm. They've not done one good thing that animals and/or humanity could have benefited from in their entire existence, it's no wonder PETA is allied so closely with them. I remember when Timothy McVeigh (swell guy, actually) was about to be executed and Ingrid wrote some letter about how his becoming a vegetarian made him a visionary along the likes of Albert Einstein and it was the funniest thing I had ever read at that point, because I know if the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building had been an animal shelter instead of a government workspace, she would have condemned him to hell even if he had become a vegan afterwards. People need to pull their heads out of their asses.

Share this topic:


  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users