Animal Liberation Front Thoughts on it
#1
Posted 16 January 2009 - 02:44 PM
Your thoughts on the group, and I do support, for animal liberation
#4
Posted 16 January 2009 - 04:05 PM
Sure
I mean are you sure?
Some just save them and think they will survive in their new naturial freedom, but there is rarly someone who does....
But if they take care of them...well thats good!
#6
Posted 16 January 2009 - 04:13 PM
So, I am against these kinds of actions. There are more effective and legal ways too.
#8 Guest_Not Jer_*
Posted 16 January 2009 - 04:37 PM
#9
Posted 16 January 2009 - 04:49 PM
#10
Posted 16 January 2009 - 10:15 PM
So you know how to properly care for a group of rats injected with formula XYZ?
Or are capable of caring for a creature that has survived vivisection?
And imagine that the creatures you freed, the formula being tested or disease being studies could cause health problems i YOU once you have them?
Or that in freeing/stealing them, you just condemn your friend's aunt to death because the study wasn't completed in time and she gets a disease they were testing treatments for.
It's never black and white. It's ugly shades of gray and NOT to be meddled with lightly or with the Idealist's rose colored glasses stuck in place.
#12
Posted 16 January 2009 - 11:08 PM
Ha ha, no. I have my own animals with issues. I can barely deal with the personal distress that gives me without handling the decisions of others made whimsically as well.
Regardless, it is up to ANYONE who takes up a banner to research not only the goals of their particular banner, but the 'enemy' as well. Put aside your prejudice and hatred in the scrutiny of your enemy, and you'll find that you'll loose a lot of enemies.
But possibly get really depressed. Black and whites are so much easier to deal with.
You stand with them if you want, but know, learn, understand from as many sources as possible (not just ALF friendly ones) what you're aligning yourself with or you will recognize your massive failure to educate yourself later on.
#13
Posted 16 January 2009 - 11:24 PM
#14
Posted 16 January 2009 - 11:40 PM
Your thoughts on the group, and I do support, for animal liberation
Violence NEVER solves violence, even if said violence is done in the name of "liberation." The solution to the issue of animal exploitation is to raise our collective consciousness to include this new "other." To achieve this goal, compassion is our only tool. Harassment and property damage create alienation and fear - it will not change most people's outlooks.
For an very well written discourse on the terror tactics used by some animal rights groups, I suggest reading Capers In The Churchyard: Animal Rights Advocacy in the Age of Terror by Lee Hall.
For anyone who truly cares about the plight of our nonhuman family, one positive direct action that anyone can take it to look at their own life in order to make changes to reduce the amount of suffering we are personally contributing to this planet. Change yourself, and you change the world.
Make peace with yourself, and the world will find peace. So simple, yet so hard. Enjoy
Shannon
#15
Posted 16 January 2009 - 11:52 PM
#16
Posted 17 January 2009 - 02:06 AM
There are other ways to experiment not involving animals and if animal testing was prohibited today, I'm sure these would be more or less perfected within a few years. I'm weary of the 'dying relative argument', as if that puts an end to all discussion. I refuse to believe there could be no other way, if there was a will to make these changes and the funds to back it up.
No, I don't think smashing labs is particularly productive or effective, my guess is this is desperate people wanting to make their message heard. It's headlines. The fact that people react more to the activist's nuttiness than their cause is unfortunate. Remember how people looked upon "tree-huggers" just a few years ago?
#17
Posted 17 January 2009 - 02:17 AM
#18
Posted 17 January 2009 - 08:57 AM
Good reading... but it's only a start. Only, barely, just a start.
Please give examples, or I just can not believe your claim. SO NOT convinced by one small statement that has a lot of words with too many connotations.
Clarify, please?
Is English your primary language, or is it a secondary?
#20 Guest_Not Jer_*
Posted 17 January 2009 - 01:35 PM
Except that deciding you don't want to eat turkey and shrimp anymore doesn't actually do shit to change the outside world. Don't confuse symbolic action for direct action, it is little more than talk. You don't have to change yourself or eating habits in order to get laws passed that prevent animals from being mistreated in testing labs or abattoirs, all you have to do is get those ideas out there and convince people they are good ideas. Too many people rely on ultra-introspection because they seem more concerned with attaining the moral high ground and it doesn't do a bit of good towards any cause.
Cuban Revolution.
It would probably be a good idea not to post anything from that, even if you are a CIRA supporter. PIRA has abandoned armed struggle and the future of Ireland belongs to Sinn Fein using the diplomatic process. The vision of the future for Ireland no longer lies with the Army Council, and Gerry Adams knows what he is doing, irrespective of my thoughts on returning to violence. Regardless, that passage only states something that is the opposite of every ALF action. All it says is if a Volunteer accidentally or otherwise damages someone's property in the course of service, that person should be given restitution by supporters of the movement in order to build community. All the ALF does is burn down labs, set animals free, and then jack themselves off like "JOB WELL DONE LADS!" Meanwhile, people are still dying of diseases that those animals were being tested to cure because the animals were more than likely found with the same disease, what a concept. Either that or they were injected with antibodies or some shit, but usually in those cases they were bred in those labs, not the taken from the wild, for that very reason. There was a case back when I was in high school too, of the ALF attacking some testing facility with monkeys and one of the ALF members wound up in the hospital a couple of days later because one of the monkeys had a contagious illness, and oops, he must have gotten to close to it.
The AFL doesn't do more harm than good, they only do harm. They've not done one good thing that animals and/or humanity could have benefited from in their entire existence, it's no wonder PETA is allied so closely with them. I remember when Timothy McVeigh (swell guy, actually) was about to be executed and Ingrid wrote some letter about how his becoming a vegetarian made him a visionary along the likes of Albert Einstein and it was the funniest thing I had ever read at that point, because I know if the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building had been an animal shelter instead of a government workspace, she would have condemned him to hell even if he had become a vegan afterwards. People need to pull their heads out of their asses.













