[Nergal]

It has come to my attention, that a certain part of the black biological makeup, makes them more resistant to cuts. I believe this gives them an unfair advantage (similar to steroids, as most other sports view them, and having a strong chin in a "Who Gets to be a Hero" contest), and therefore they should be abolished from the sport. As some of you may know, many TKOs are the result of an early cut, and thereby giving a win to the cutter, which is earned not by superior skill, but luck. This is bullshit, in my eyes. So:

Vote...should blacks be allowed in MMA competitions such as UFC, PRIDE and K-1 Tournaments?

[Dr. Frostbite]

But if we're going into genetic makeup, then I'd also talk about how mexican prizefighters/luchadore are resistant to bruising, reducing the chance of a swollen eye and harder to tko.


So in all fairness, MMA would be a european/oceania/asian sport.


with a few exceptions like Dan Henderson running around, lol.

[ChristineZ]

I don't think they should be banned.
It's their choice and they know the risks. I think the decision should be made by the individual.
Taking necessary precautions is what it's all about. They deserve to win to.
If one has HIV and it becomes a medical issue, that's different.
But no, I don't think so. It's like taking away someones dream that they worked so hard for.
Freedom of choice. Everyone deserves a chance.

I do see your point, but I don't think they should be banned.
Edited

[Dr. Frostbite]

I don't think they should be banned.
It's their choice and they know the risks. I think the decision should be made by the individual.
Taking necessary precautions is what it's all about. They deserve to win to.
If they have HIV and it becomes a medical issue, that's different.
But no, I don't think so. It's like taking away someones dream that they worked so hard for.
Freedom of choice.

Yeah...I don't think you got the point of the thread. The OP is saying that Negroes be banned because of their cut resistance....lol.

[ChristineZ]

Yeah...I don't think you got the point of the thread. The OP is saying that Negroes be banned because of their cut resistance....lol.

No. I do get it. I know they are resistant to cuts, but does that automatically disqualify them in other areas to? I just think it's wrong to take away the opportunity.

[Jer]

No. If you banned them for cut resistance you'd have to ban mexicans for bruise resistance, asians for low blow resistance, etc etc etc

Every race has it's own advantages, it's like an MMORPG except it's real life! Why today I stepped outside and I was a level 19 Massage Therapist. It was definitely the best game I have ever played, the graphics were awesome and when I looked at the trees the leaves weren't flat. There was no lag. I saw people walking around and driving vehicles. There were a lot of different classes around me but there weren't that many characters past level 80. Nobody had weapons because the city levels don't allow weapons. Though some weapons were hidden around like a rock, stick or gun. This game was awsome, I might play tomorrow.

[Dr. Frostbite]

No. If you banned them for cut resistance you'd have to ban mexicans for bruise resistance, asians for low blow resistance, etc etc etc

That was the point I was trying to make. And RL is an MMORPG. I'm a level 37 Fighter with 3 levels of bard.

[Nergal]

No. I just wanna ban the blacks, for being cut resistant. OR make the TKO rules on cuts different.

[Jer]

Brett, just stop before the feminists get riled up in here talking about how men are more cut and bruise resistant.

[Nergal]

ill cut you
you flaming fagrag

and/or
no
dumb sand nigra